Sorry guys, I have to go here. Thanks to President Obama's Fluke (see previous blog post), we have a debate about whether health insurance providers should have to fund contraceptives.
I do not think that insurance companies or taxpayers should have to pay for contraceptives. In any form. Period. Yes, this means no free condoms at schools either. Why? It's an easy argument really.
Sexual activity is meant to be used for reproduction. If one wishes not to reproduce, then they are engaging in that activity for their enjoyment or recreation. If a person is using a from of contraceptive, they do not desire to reproduce. Therefore, anytime a contraceptive is used, it is for recreation, is it not?
So should insurance companies and taxpayers have to fund recreation? Should a person not have to pay for their own entertainment?
If not, then I would like to have my favorite recreation funded. So sign me up for free bullets!
No comments:
Post a Comment