data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/110c7/110c77159ecac191e6038d66120756dcbf8facc7" alt=""
The Massachusetts House voted yesterday to allow the Governor to appoint a temporary person to fill Kennedy's Senate seat. (link here) It will be a temporary appointment until the special elections can take place sometime next year. So why is this hypocritical?
Traditionally, the Governor of each State has authority to appoint a Senator in the event that the seat is vacated. However, while Mitt Romney was Governor a few years ago,
This is so obviously corrupt and hypocritical. I am writing about it here, because you probably will not hear or see it in the news. See, Democrats want to maintain a 60 vote majority in the Senate, because this gives them a filibuster-proof majority. Any bill with less than 60 votes (dems had 59 after Kennedy passed) can be blocked by a filibuster. After these shenanigans, they will have a filibuster-proof majority again just before the Health Care bill and the Cap and Trade bill are voted on.
Nope, nothing to see here! Move along!
Great story. I haven't heard of any news station mentioning this before. It really is pathetic how hypocritical some people are.
ReplyDelete